T.V. PheroLure® : Volatile emission by semiochemical lures and the impact thereof on the volatile profile of a commercial tomato field

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/2254-8854/2023/a14027

Keywords:

Toxicity, South Africa, Insect monitoring, volatile organic compound, VOC

Abstract

Pheromone-based or semiochemical lures for insect detection and monitoring in agriculture is common practice. Many countries exempt these devices from regulatory requirements,  but not South Africa. The question arises whether the pheromone/semiochemical lures influence the naturally occurring compounds significantly, to justify concern for human toxicity and ecotoxicity. T.V. PheroLure® is a novel five-component lure developed by Insect Science (Pty) Ltd. used for monitoring African bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (an important insect pest on tomatoes). T.V. PheroLure® is a volatile organic compound (VOC) blend impregnated in a polyethylene bulb. The influence of T.V. PheroLure® on the volatile profile of a tomato field was evaluated in a commercial growing area of South Africa. Tomato VOCs were collected before, during and after the application of six T.V. PheroLures® in yellow bucket funnel traps randomly distributed over 1 ha. VOCs were collected from planting until harvest (22 weeks) at five randomly selected sites. Collection also took place in adjacent tomato fields where no T.V. PheroLure® was applied. The constituents of T.V. PheroLure® had no significant influence on the naturally occurring VOCs observed in the tomato field. The results suggest that the concern for toxicity and ecotoxicity is unjustified when using semiochemical devices for monitoring purposes. The natural physiology of the plant, rather than T.V. PheroLure®, influenced the VOCs observed in a tomato field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Baldwin EA, Scott JW, Shewmaker CK, Schuch W. 2000. Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components. HortScience 35(6):1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.35.6.1013

Baldwin IT. 2010. Plant volatiles. Current Biology 20(9):R392–R397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.052

Beltran J, Serrano E, Lopez FJ, Peruga A, Valcarcel M, Rosello S. 2006. Comparison of two quantitative GC-MS methods for analysis of tomato aroma based on purge-and-trap and on solid-phase microextraction. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 385(7):1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-0410-9

Buttery RG, Ling LC, Light DM. 1987. Tomato leaf volatile aroma components. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 35(6):1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00078a043

Buttery RG, Seifert RM, Guadagni DG, Ling LC. 1971. Characterization of additional volatile components of tomato. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 19(3):524–529. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60175a011

Bylesjö M, Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Trygg J. 2006. OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS-DA and SIMCA classification. Journal of Chemometrics 20(8–10):341–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1006

DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). 2015a. Guidelines on the data and documents required for registration of agricultural remedies in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). 2015b. Guidelines on the data required for registration of biological/biopesticides remedies in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

Dalal KB, Olson LE, Yu MH, Salunkhe DK. 1967. Gas chromatography of the field-, glass- Greenhouse-grown, and artificially ripened tomatoes. Lycopersicon esculentum mill. Phytochemistry 6(1):155–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(67)85025-8

Du X, Song M, Baldwin E, Rouseff R. 2015. Identification of sulphur volatiles and GC-olfactometry aroma profiling in two fresh tomato cultivars. Food Chemistry 171:306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.013

Frérot B, Leppik E, Groot AT, Unbehend M, Holopainen J. 2017. Chemical signatures in plant–insect interactions. Advances in Botanical Research 81:139–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2016.10.003

Holopainen JK, Gershenzon J. 2010. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends in Plant Science 15(3):176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.01.006

Holopainen JK, Blande JD. 2012. Molecular plant volatile communication. Advances in Experimental Medical Biology 739:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1704-0_2

Insect Science (Pty) Ltd. 2018. Insect Science inhouse research and development data. Tzaneen: Insect Science.

Joubert VP. 2011. The use of thermal desorption to profile mango fruit volatiles and their role in lenticel discolouration [MSc Dissertation]. Pretoria: Tshwane University of Technology.

LII [Legal Information Institute]. 2004 Exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/180.900

Markes International. 2014. World-leading products for thermal desorption. http://www.markes.com/Products/Sampling-accessories/Sorbenttubes/Stainless-steel.aspx

Mayer F, Takeoka GR, Buttery RG, Whitehand LC, Naim M, Rabinowitch HD. 2008. Studies on the aroma of five fresh tomato cultivars and the precursors of cis- and trans-4,5-epoxy-(E)-2-decenals and methional. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56(10):3749–3757. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0732915

Mehl F, Marti G, Boccard J, Debrus B, Merle P, Delort E, Baroux L, Raymo V, Velazco MI, Sommer H, et al. 2014. Differentiation of lemon essential oil based on volatile and non-volatile fractions with various analytical techniques: a metabolomic approach. Food Chemistry 143:325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.125

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2003. OECD Guidance for industry data submissions for pheromones and other semiochemicals and their active substances, Paris: OECD Directorate. Available at https://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/pesticides-biocides/31919832.pdf

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018. Guidance document on semiochemical active substances and plant protection products: Series on Pesticides and Biocides. No. 93. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fe2261bf-en

Petro-Turza M. 1986. Flavor of tomato and tomato products. Food Reviews International 2(3):309–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559128609540802

Pinto FA, Mattos MVV, Silva FWS, Rocha SL, Elliot SL. 2017. The spread of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and coexistence with Helicoverpa zea in Southeastern Brazil. Insects 8(3):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8030087

PHI (Post-harvest Innovation Programme) 2020. Tomatoes. Post-Harvest Innovation Programme. https://postharvestinnovation.org.za/commodities/tomatoes/

Prinsloo G, Uys V (editors). 2015. Insects of Cultivated Plants and Natural Pastures in Southern Africa. Johannesburg: Entomological Society of Southern Africa.

Pyne AW, Wick EL. 1965. Volatile components of tomatoes. Journal of Food Science 30(2):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1965.tb00289.x

Ravi KC, Mohan KS, Manjunath TM, Head G, Patil BV, Greba DPA, Premalatha K, Peter J, Rao NGV. 2005. Relative abundance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host crops in India and the role of these crops as natural refuge for Bacillus thuringiensis Cotton. Environmental Entomology 34(1):59–69. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.1.59

Sandasi M, Kamatou GPP, Gavaghan C, Baranska M, Viljoen AM. 2011. A quality control method for geranium oil based on vibrational spectroscopy and chemometric data analysis. Vibrational Spectroscopy 57(2):242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vibspec.2011.08.002

Tholl D, Boland W, Hansel A, Loreto F, Rose US, Schnitzler JP. 2006. Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis. The Plant Journal 45(4):540–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02612.x

Tikunov Y, Lommen A, de Vos CH, Verhoeven HA, Bino RJ, Hall RD, Bovy AG. 2005. A novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiology 139(3):1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.068130

Viani R, Bricout J, Marion JP, Müggler-Chavan F, Reymond D, Egli RH. 1969. Sur la composition de l’arôme de tomate. Helvetica Chimica Acta 52(4):887–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19690520404

Vurro M, Miguel-Rojas C, Perez-de-Luque A. 2019. Safe nanotechnologies for increasing the effectiveness of environmentally friendly natural agrochemicals. Pest Management Science 75(9):2403–2412. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5348

Wang L, Baldwin EA, Bai J. 2016. Recent Advance in aromatic volatile research in tomato fruit: The metabolisms and regulations. Food and Bioprocess Technology 9(2):203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-015-1638-1

Wang L, Qian C, Bai J, Luo W, Jin C, Yu Z. 2018. Difference in volatile composition between the pericarp tissue and inner tissue of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 42(1):e13387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13387

Wishart DS. 2008. Metabolomics: Applications to food science and nutrition research. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19(9):482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.03.003

Witzgall P, Kirsch P, Cork A. 2010. Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36(1):80–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y

Downloads

Published

2023-05-18

How to Cite

1.
van Tonder AJ, Nortjé GP, Botha BM. T.V. PheroLure® : Volatile emission by semiochemical lures and the impact thereof on the volatile profile of a commercial tomato field. Afr. Entomol. [Internet]. 2023 May 18 [cited 2024 Jun. 22];31. Available from: https://www.africanentomology.com/article/view/14027

Issue

Section

Articles