First conservation assessment of selected long-proboscid flies (Moegistorhynchus and Prosoeca, Diptera: Nemestrinidae) endemic to South Africa’s Cape region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/2254-8854/2026/a24785Keywords:
Data deficient , extinction risk, habitat loss, IUCN Red List, protected area network, threatenedAbstract
Long-proboscid flies of the genera Moegistorhynchus and Prosoeca (Nemestrinidae) are charismatic nectar-feeding insects with several species considered to be keystone pollinators, yet their conservation status is unknown. Recent taxonomic work has improved our understanding of some species identities and distributions, therefore providing a basis for conservation assessments. Building on this updated taxonomy, we conducted baseline IUCN Red List assessments for eight endemic species to evaluate their extinction risk. We estimated range-size metrics following IUCN guidelines and incorporated national spatial overlays to assess habitat loss, ecosystem threat status, and protected area coverage. We found that two species are classified as Endangered, one as Near Threatened, three as Data Deficient and two as Least Concern. All species assessed have experienced high habitat loss (28–57%) as a result of agriculture and urban expansion, particularly along coastal areas, and 8–31% of the remaining habitat falls within threatened ecosystems. Less than 11% of the ranges of the Endangered and Near Threatened species overlap with protected areas. Data Deficient species are known from fewer than three localities, underscoring the need for systematic surveys and intensive sampling of these poorly known taxa. Information on distributions, population sizes, host plants, and larval biology remains extremely limited for all taxa and is urgently needed. As the first Red List assessment for flies in South Africa, and for a specialist fly pollinator, this study identifies threatened species, highlights data-deficient taxa, and provides important baseline information for future research and conservation efforts on this hyper-diverse insect group.
Downloads
References
Barraclough DA. 2006. An overview of the South African tangle-veined flies (Diptera: Nemestrinidae), with an annotated key to the genera and a checklist of species. Zootaxa. 1277: 39–63. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1277.1.4
Barraclough DA. 2017. Nemestrinidae (tangle-veined flies). In: Kirk-Spriggs AH, Sinclair BH (eds), Manual of Afrotropical Diptera, vol. 2. Nematocerous Diptera and lower Brachycera. Suricata 5. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute; pp 995–1003.
Barraclough DA, Colville JF. 2024. Revision of the endemic South African genus Moegistorhynchus Macquart (Diptera: Nemestrinidae), with a species key, description of three new species and comments on pollination biology and biogeography. Zootaxa. 5519: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5519.1.1
Barraclough DA, Colville JF, Karolyi F, Krenn HW. 2018. A striking new species of Prosoeca Schiner, 1867 (Diptera: Nemestrinidae): an important pollinator from the Bokkeveld Plateau, Northern Cape Province, South Africa. Zootaxa. 4497: 411–421. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4497.3.5
Barraclough DA, Slotow R. 2010. The South African keystone pollinator Moegistorhynchus longirostris (Wiedemann, 1819) (Diptera: Nemestrinidae): notes on biology, biogeography and proboscis length variation. African Invertebrates. 51: 397–403. https://doi.org/10.5733/afin.051.0208
Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemüller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers, AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, et al. 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science. 313: 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127863
Borgelt J, Dorber M, Høiberg MA, Verones F. 2022. More than half of data deficient species predicted to be threatened by extinction. Communications Biology. 5: 679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03638-9
Cardoso P. 2020. Red: IUCN redlisting tools. R package version 1.5.0. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=red
Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV, New TR. 2011. The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation. 144: 2647–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.07.024
Cazalis V, Di Marco M, Butchart SHM, Akçakaya HR, González-Suárez M, Meyer C, Clausnitzer V, Böhm M, Zizka A, Cardoso P, et al. 2022. Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 37: 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.12.002
Colville JF, Potts AJ, Bradshaw PL, Measey GJ, Snijman D, Picker MD, Procheş Ş, Bowie RCK, Manning JC. 2014. Floristic and faunal Cape biochoria: do they exist? In: Allsopp N, Colville JF, Verboom GA (eds), Fynbos: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation of a Megadiverse Region. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 73–92.
Department of Environmental Affairs. 2020. South Africa Protected Areas Database (SAPAD_IR_2019_Q4_01). Vector digital data. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs Publication. Available at https://www.dffe.gov.za/egis [accessed 19 September 2024]
Dowle M, Srinivasan A. 2022. data.table: extension of data.frame. R package version 1.14.6. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table
Fallon CE, Walker AC, Lewis S, Cicero J, Faust L, Heckscher CM, Pérez-Hernández CX, Pfeiffer B, Jepsen S. 2021. Evaluating firefly extinction risk: initial Red List assessments for North America. PLoS One. 16: e0259379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259379
Fox R, Harrower CA, Bell JR, Shortall CR, Middlebrook I, Wilson RJ. 2019. Insect population trends and the IUCN Red List process. Journal of Insect Conservation. 23: 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-0117-1
Gallagher R, Roger E, Packer J, Slatyer C, Rowley J, Cornwell W, Ens E, Legge S, Simpfendorfer C, Stephens R, Mesaglio T. 2025. Incorporating citizen science into IUCN Red List assessments. Conservation Biology. 39: e14329. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14329
Gaston KJ, Fuller RA. 2009. The sizes of species’ geographic ranges. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01596.x
Goldblatt P, Manning JC. 2000. The long proboscid fly pollination system in southern Africa. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 87: 146–170.
Hijmans RJ. 2022. terra: spatial data analysis. R package version 1.5-34. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra
IUCN. 2024. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Search for ‘Diptera’ . The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2024-3. Available at https://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 12 November 2025].
IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee. 2024. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 16. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Committee. Available at https://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf [accessed 11 November 2024].
Karolyi F, Morawetz L, Colville JF, Handschuh S, Metscher BD, Krenn HW. 2013. Time management and nectar flow: flower handling and suction feeding in long-proboscid flies (Nemestrinidae: Prosoeca). Naturwissenschaften. 100: 1083–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1114-6
Karolyi F, Szucsich NU, Colville JF, Krenn HW. 2012. Adaptations for nectar-feeding in the mouthparts of long-proboscid flies (Nemestrinidae: Prosoeca). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 107: 414–424.
Kirk-Spriggs AH, Sinclair BJ (eds). 2017. Manual of Afrotropical Diptera, vol. 1. Introductory chapters and keys to Diptera families. Suricata 4. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
Krenn HW, Colville JF, Melin A, Bleikolm A-K, Distiller G, Karolyi F. 2025. Nectar-feeding ecology, ecomorphological adaptations and variation in proboscis length in a long-proboscid fly (Diptera: Nemestrinidae: Prosoeca). In: Betz O (ed.), Insect ecomorphology: linking functional insect morphology to ecology and evolution. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp 457–467.
Krenn HW, Karolyi F, Lampert P, Melin A, Colville JF. 2021. Nectar uptake of a long-proboscid Prosoeca fly (Nemestrinidae) — Proboscis morphology and flower shape. Insects. 12: 371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12040371
Lötter D, le Maitre D. 2014. Modelling the distribution of Aspalathus linearis (Rooibos tea): implications of climate change for livelihoods dependent on both cultivation and harvesting from the wild. Ecology and Evolution. 4: 1209–1221. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.985
Mace GM. 2004. The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 359: 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1454
Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, Akçakaya HR, Leader-Williams N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Stuart SN. 2008. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conservation Biology. 22: 1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01044.x
Manning JC. 2004. Needles and pins. Veld & Flora. March: 10–12.
Mecenero S, Edge DA, Staude HS, Coetzer BH, Coetzer AJ, Raimondo DC, Williams MC, Armstrong AJ, Ball JB, Bode JD, et al. 2020. Outcomes of the southern African Lepidoptera conservation assessment (SALCA). Metamorphosis. 31: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.4314/met.v31i4.1
Melin A, Colville JF, Manning JC, Beale CM. 2026. Estimating area of occupancy for specialist oil-collecting bees: integrating species distribution models and spatial overlays to assess extinction risk. Journal of Insect Conservation. 30: 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-025-00737-w
Miller-Struttmann NE, Geib JC, Franklin JD, Kevan PG, Holdo RM, Ebert-May D, Lynn AM, Kettenbach JA, Hedrick E, Galen C. 2015. Functional mismatch in a bumble bee pollination mutualism under climate change. Science. 349: 1541–1544. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0868
Mucina L, Rutherford MC (eds) 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
Müller K, Wickham H. 2022. tibble: simple data frames. R package version 3.1.8. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tibble
Newbold T, Hudson LN, Contu S, Hill SLL, Beck J, Liu Y, Meyer C, Phillips HRP, Purvis A. 2018. Widespread winners and narrow-ranged losers: land use homogenizes biodiversity in local assemblages worldwide. PLoS Biology. 16: e2006841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006841.
Newman E, Johnson SD. 2021. A shift in long-proboscid fly pollinators and floral tube length among populations of Erica junonia (Ericaceae). South African Journal of Botany. 142: 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.07.014
Nieto A, Roberts SPM, Kemp J, Rasmont P, Kuhlmann M, García Criado M, Biesmeijer JC, Bogusch P, Dathe HH, de la Rúa P, et al. 2014. IUCN Global Species Programme European Red List of Bees. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2779/77003
O’Farrell PJ, Donaldson JS, Hoffman MT, Mader AD. 2008. Small mammal diversity and density on the Bokkeveld escarpment, South Africa – implications for conservation and livestock predation. African Zoology. 43: 117–124. https://doi.org/10.3377/1562-7020(2008)43[117:SMDADO]2.0.CO;2
Pebesma E. 2018. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal. 10: 439–446. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009
QGIS.org. 2024. QGIS Geographic Information System. Version 3.40. QGIS Association. Available at https://www.qgis.org.
R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/
Raven PH, Wagner DL. 2021. Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 118: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002548117
Skowno AL, van Deventer H, Benghu S, Slingsby JA, Jewitt D. 2020. National habitat modification data (1990–2018). Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at https://catalogue.saeon.ac.za/records/10.15493/SAEON.FYNBOS.10000011 [accessed 8 August 2024].
Skowno AL, Jewitt D, Slingsby JA. 2021. Rates and patterns of habitat loss across South Africa’s vegetation biomes. South African Journal of Science. 117: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/8182
Skowno AL, Monyeki MS. 2021. South Africa’s Red List of terrestrial ecosystems (RLEs). Land. 10: 1048. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10101048
South African National Biodiversity Institute and Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment. 2021. Red List of ecosystems (RLE) for terrestrial realm for South Africa – remnants. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Available at http://ecosystemstatus.sanbi.org.za [accessed 29 April 2025].
van Swaay C, Maes D, Collins S, Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I, Cuttelod A. 2011. Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: how red is the Red List of European butterflies? Biological Conservation. 144: 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.034
Vujić A, Gilbert F, Flinn G, Englefield E, Ferreira CC, Varga Z, Eggert F, Woolcock S, Böhm M, Mergy R, et al. 2022. Pollinators on the edge: our European hoverflies. The European Red List of hoverflies. Brussels: European Commission. Available at https://doi.org/10.2779/359875
Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K. 2022. dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.0.8. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annalie Melin, David A. Barraclough, Jonathan F. Colville

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


.png)